Prometheus
will likely end its run at cinemas in the next couple of weeks and have
achieved somewhere close to a worldwide box office total near $310 million.
Whilst this figure is certainly nothing to get excited about, given the hype
surrounding the film, it has been considered enough of a success that a sequel
has been recently been given the go-ahead.
Since
release, it has met with a mixed response from audiences, with the majority
still giving generally favourable reviews. Now, even as a die-hard fan of the
Alien franchise, I don’t intend to use this blog to promote how amazing I found
the film and bash those who had reservations. Instead, I am going to focus on
the possible factors behind some of the negative press it received, in addition
to why it didn’t achieve the financial success many had expected.
Despite
the excitement over Prometheus, one must remember the last films in the Alien series,
Alien vs. Predator (2004) and Alien vs. Predator: Requiem (2007), only made
$172million and $128 million respectively, and were almost universally panned
with even diehard fans in no rush for a further instalment. Given the state of
the franchise, if not for the involvement of Ridley Scott, director of the
original Alien (1979), it is debatable whether Prometheus would have been
green-lit by 20th Century Fox with this level of exposure. That
being said, whilst Scott’s reputation as one of the world’s leading directors
can’t be denied, his films over the last decade have not been met with the acclaim of
previous efforts. Kingdom of Heaven (2004),
A Good Year (2006), American Gangster (2007), Body of Lies (2008), Robin Hood (2010)
all came and went without lingering in the memory for long. It is back in
2000 with Gladiator where Scott last displayed he still had ‘it’.
Credit
goes to Scott however, as, despite alleged pressure from Fox, the film
continued with its R rating in the United States which would automatically have
an adverse effects on audience figures, despite the flip-side of this giving
more freedom over the film’s content. Whilst this would undoubtedly satisfy
fans of the Alien films, it seems a 50/50 decision if the intention was to launch a
new franchise. How successful would this be if the next generation of potential
Alien fans were too young to watch the film? Perhaps as a result of the R rating
and the known content of the previous films in the series, Prometheus was shown
at considerably less cinemas in the United States than the other major release
that week, Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted, 3396 cinemas compared to 4258.
Now to
the film itself.
After reading
many reviews, the area Prometheus has received most criticism has been the
script. One of the more endearing features of Alien and Aliens were the
characters and their every-man backgrounds. In Alien, we had a crew of a rusty
salvage ship, complaining about not getting paid. The same complaints also come
from the marines in Aliens and, ultimately, when the going got tough, many
wanted to get the hell out of LV-426 and go home. Concerns over not getting
paid and doing a runner in tough times are feelings I’m sure most have felt at
some point. Compare this to Prometheus where the bulk of the dialogue between
the main characters is concerned with questioning humanity’s origins, who are
our creators and what might their true intentions be? These are certainly issues
that are not for everyone. Staying within sci-fi, the same problem is seen when
comparing the prequel Star Wars films with the original trilogy as the rogue-like
ways of Han usually win over the ongoing jedi-wisdom of Qui-Gon.
It has
been mentioned by Ridley Scott that he was not going to be able to fit all
ideas into a single film, therefore leaving some unresolved plot threads to a
future film that was not guaranteed at the time. Taking this approach, there
has been criticism at some of the film’s open-ended aspects, what happens to
Elizabeth and David, what were the intentions of the engineers? Whilst there is
now news of a sequel in the works, Scott has mentioned it may take two further
films to full bridge the gap between the Prometheus films and the original
Alien. One can only hope that, by looking at Prometheus’s box-office performance,
Fox will realise they will only be able to squeeze out one more film and wrap
up the series instead of, should the second film be unsuccessful, leaving it in
limbo, for geeks to theorise over for years to come.
In defence
of the film, where many have remarked it is not a horror film like Alien, it was
never advertised as one. Some have clearly gone in with a drastically incorrect
impression of what they were about to see. From interviews, online features,
and trailers, Prometheus has always been marketed as a film focused around
the origins of humanity and the identity of our creators. This may be a
natural consequence where the Alien franchise is seen as sci-fi horror however,
if you can get past that, by placing the film within the Alien universe, it builds on so much rich mythology and untapped materials, such as the
identity of the space jockey, who has never been mentioned since
Alien.
Where my
objectivity is severely stretched is when I see people ranting on Facebook and
Twitter that the film didn’t answer any questions. Unless I saw a different
film, it answers, almost everything except for why the engineers decide to plot
a course for Earth to unleash holy hell. Due to the time between the Alien
films, there have been many years for people to discuss the role of the Space Jockey
and how its ship landed on LV-426. Viewing Prometheus, the audience is
essentially told these questions are not overly important as it delves into
something much bigger. The ship seen in Alien is one of many and the engineers,
our creators, reveal they are imperfect beings as their creations rise up against
them, as evident by the corpse found by the crew of the Prometheus. As their flawed
nature is revealed, it shouldn’t be a surprise that, on another ship 30 years
later, an egg hatches early and the rest is history.
In
conclusion, Prometheus takes considerable risk in building upon the mythology,
mainly found in the series’ first two films and, expands its universe without
downplaying the significance of Alien and Aliens. Whilst it may suffer from
leaving some open-ended plot threads, these are areas, fingers crossed, that
will be resolved in the upcoming sequel.
I had 2 issues with the film. Why is Guy Pierce playing an old man in noticeable old age make up, walking in typical theatre "old man played by young man" fashion, throughout the film when an older actor could do it far better? Even if it was planned to flashback to his youth, it would be far more effective to have Pierce play the younger and get an actual old actor to play the old man. A real coo would have been Peter O'Toole, himself.
ReplyDeleteSecond, what human, looking at a pile of fossilized dead bodies, trapped in a scary cave, would, unprotected, put his face next to an unknown alien slimy creature. It's SO counter intuitive that it lowers the film to one of those old slasher films where teenagers make equally unlikely decisions, only to be lined up for slaughter.
Don't get me wrong, I give the film a marginal thumbs up, but in comparison to the first two Aliens, and I would even argue the first Alien V. Predator, it is weak. Scott's weak is still better than a lot of movies, but this could have been much better.